Post by pracrutaka on Sept 15, 2016 19:51:00 GMT -5
Watch Blair Witch (2016) dvd quality
WATCH: tinyurl.com/hakzuxc
DOWNLOAD NOW: tinyurl.com/hakzuxc
Release Date:
September 15, 2016
Runtime:
90 minutes
categories:
Horror Thriller
- Horror
- Thriller
Production:
- Lionsgate
Language:
- English
Budget:
US $0
Country:
- United States of America
Rating:
3.7 / 18
Movie Synopsis:
A college student ventures with a group of friends into the Black Hills Forest in Maryland to uncover the mystery surrounding the disappearance of his sister years earlier, which many believe is connected to the legend of the Blair Witch. At first the group is hopeful, especially when a pair of locals offer to act as guides through the dark and winding woods, but as the endless night wears on, the group is visited by a menacing presence. Slowly, they begin to realize the legend is all too real and more sinister than they could have imagined.
Instructions to Download Full Movie:
1. Click the link. tinyurl.com/hakzuxc
2. Create you free account & you will be redirected to your movie!!
Enjoy Your Free Full HD Movies!
----------------------------------------------------
Keywords:
Blair Witch (2016) Full Movie
Blair Witch (2016) Full Movie english subtitles
Blair Witch (2016) trailer review
Blair Witch (2016) trailer
Blair Witch (2016) [HD] (3D) regarder en francais English Subtitles
Blair Witch (2016) PelÃÂcula Completa Subtitulada en Español
Blair Witch (2016) Full Movie subtitled in Spanish
Blair Witch (2016) Full Movie subtitled in French
Blair Witch (2016) Film complet sous-titrée en français
Blair Witch (2016) Full Movie subtitled in German
Blair Witch (2016) volledige film ondertiteld in het Nederlands
Blair Witch (2016) Full movie subtitled in Portuguese
Blair Witch (2016) Filme completo com legendas em Português
Watch Blair Witch online gorillavid, Watch Blair Witch (2016) dvd quality online, Blair Witch live stream free, Watch Blair Witch movie online free, Watch Blair Witch in hd online free, Blair Witch (2016) movie online stream, Blair Witch (2016) movie live stream, Blair Witch (2016) full stream, Watch Blair Witch (2016) stream free,
Blair Witch full movie hd stream
REVIEWS:
Reviewer 1:
You know when a horror movie has a quote saying "One of the scariest movies ever made" attached to its trailer and then you see it and feel as if you were cheated by that movie because it wasn't actually scary at all? Well, that's so not the case with Blair Witch, the surprise sequel to The Blair Witch Project, a movie that redefined the horror genre back in 1999. Now, I'm no horror aficionado but Blair Witch is one of the most terrifying experiences I've had in the cinema.
Twenty-two years after his sister and friends disappeared while documenting their trip to investigate the Blair Witch legend, James Donahue (James Allen McCune) plus three of his college friends and two local residents venture into the same woods to try and find them.
Strange occurrences and a strong supernatural presence makes them come to the realisation that the legend of the Blair Witch is true and their lives are now the ones in danger.
First things first, I love how nobody knew anything about this being a sequel to The Blair Witch Project until barely two months ago at San Diego Comic-Con, having been filmed and marketed under the name The Woods, leading to a lot of talk and buzz about Blair Witch prior to release.
It's great to see a director like Adam Wingard take on the challenge of making a sequel that isn't just a carbon copy of its predecessor, instead choosing to take elements and build upon them to create a sequel that, I think, surpasses the original.
Blair Witch once again plays out in the found footage style that the original made so popular however, with the advancements in technology, there are more devices the filmmakers could use such as drones and go pro cameras rather than just the hand-held models.
It makes for a much more intense and fear inducing experience when the cameras used to capture the footage offer more stability. There are a few really good sequences throughout because of this, including a few nailbiting first person shots that will leave you on the edge of your seat.
The use of sound too plays a pivotal part in building the audience's fear, Wingard showcasing that he knows how to make an effective horror flick, the moments of silence proving unbearable at times.
The performances and script are always key in the difference between a good and bad horror movie. In Blair Witch, both are good enough for the audience to buy into the story. The stand-outs for me were either James Allen McCune or Callie Hernandez as Lisa, who has to do a lot of terrified close-ups in her role.
Blair Witch's strongest asset, like its predecessor, is the fear of the unknown. I said it about The Blair Witch Project and I'll say the same about Blair Witch; it's so good to see a horror movie willing to not blow its load early and keep the audience in the dark as much as the characters.
Reviewer 2:
I'm giving this a 7 but that's probably a bit high. I watched the original in theatres and almost every horror movie released since then. I'm a huge horror fan and think we've experienced a rebirth of the horror genre over the past few years and have been spoiled by many great offerings.
Blair Witch was scary. A group of people go into the woods to find out what happened to one of the main characters' sister. It has a creepy atmosphere and great use of cameras. It also makes you feel claustrophobic at times and is very true to the original.
The problem with the film is the overuse of jump scares. The sheer number of jump scares was unnecessary and detracted from the creepy atmosphere that the film otherwise had going for it. I understand the desire for some jump scares - but this just got ridiculous.
Otherwise, it was a good movie and worth a watch.
Reviewer 3:
This rating feels really harsh as this was a genuinely good movie and an excellent homage to the original.However the issues here are two-fold:
1. If you've seen the original there's really no need to see this one. It's effectively a modern remake of the original film with some minor tweaks. As a result, there isn't really much need for its existence other than to make more money for the film studio.
2. Part of what made the original so genre-defining and so ruthlessly scary (at the time) was the fact that nothing had been seen like it before. Tie that in with all the paraphernalia that went with it – mockumentaries, interviews with relatives, the actors in hiding for months, and it meant people were genuinely terrified before they'd even set foot in the cinema. Without all that, and with people being so accustomed to 'hand-held horror films' now, this film doesn't really deliver anywhere near the terror or frights that its namesake did 17 years ago.
Despite the above however, Blair Witch does so much of what 'Project' did well. For a start, the characters make genuinely, believable choices (minus maybe the idea of going into the woods in the first place). When you find yourself thinking you'd definitely leave at that stage - the characters attempt to leave. When you think at that stage you'd set up camp for the night rather than wandering round in the dark – they set up camp for the night… So often in horror films we have to put up with idiotic characters making idiotic, wholly unrealistic decisions and suffering the consequences as a result. At least with the BW series, you can actually empathise with the characters as they act in a similar manner to that, any of us would in the same situation.
Then, somewhat in homage to the original, it brings in elements of new camera-work which add to the tension and genuinely seem to present some alternative ways of filming (GPS cameras connected to the ear, looking through the reverse screen of a video camera, drone cameras etc) and all are integrated into the story seamlessly rather than being thrown in for the sake of it.
Finally, although I personally found myself relatively unmoved by the whole thing, the cinema itself barely moved when the credits rolled. My partner and I watched the entirety of the credits and were still two of the first out. It was as if everyone was waiting for the lights to come on first, which would suggest maybe others were more unnerved. I've never seen anything like it! In summation, if you've seen the original, there's really no need to see 'Blair Witch'. It's not that you'll be disappointed as it does a lot well, but it does a lot well because it practically mirrors the first. Not a bad film by any stretch but doesn't offer enough new material to warrant its existence.
Reviewer 4:
This movie is nothing but a montage of cheap jump scares. There's so many jump scares of people scaring the f**k out of each other for no apparent reason (apparently everyone likes to breath down each other's necks). Seeing people just record themselves while sleeping is just dumb. Character development was super weak, and its not like they did anything interesting with the characters anyway, felt like they wanted to have some extras just to kill off. There was this Lane character whose story arch wast even explained properly. The worst thing about this movie is people screaming your ears off, it was just too much irritating to listen to, and the constant camera shake makes you nauseous within couple of minutes. Set design was awful and cheap location for shooting with no art direction. Just a cheap money grab.
Reviewer 5:
The true sequel to The Blair Witch Project (I'm discounting the straight-to-DVD nonsense), Blair Witch follows the brother and a group of friends as he tries to find out what happened to his sister from the first movie. This was initially titled "The Woods" and then it changed a few months ago (probably some marketing campaign), but hey it doesn't matter because this film was completely mediocre. I was probably one of the rare movie reviewers who did not enjoy the first movie, I understand why it got so famous but I found it incredibly boring. This film is just a complete rehash of its predecessor but with fancier cameras and some more expendable teenagers. These characters were so thinly written that literally no one cared for their fates, no backstory whatsoever and could've been replaced by anyone. The script did allow the legend of the so called 'Blair Witch' to be explored even further, but it's not enough to increase my rating. It takes a good third way through the film before anything interesting actually happens, and due to the poor script it just made the beginning boring. The jump scares were nothing but loud noises, either from deep within the woods or when a character suddenly emerges on screen. Nothing scary about this film, until the last 20 minutes when we find our characters in a familiar place. This was when the film picked up the tension and suspense and actually worked really well, it was just 60 minutes too late. I'm sure you are all aware of the famous ending that the first film had, this film attempts to explain that ambiguously and it kind of worked (don't worry, I shall not spoil it). The use of the found footage technique kept it consistent, but it was even more irritating in this especially when the characters are running in the dark...it's impossible to see anything! Overall, Blair Witch was an unnecessary sequel to a movie that did make a cultural impact but was actually boring, this rehash was completely the same but just slightly more enjoyable.
- Review at: www.themoviediorama.com
Reviewer 6:
A worthy sequel. If you're not a fan of the original, then you won't need to involve yourself with Blair Witch. I came to the cinema with expectation of disappointment because of others saying it was sort of a remake. But I really needed to watch it, I can't not. Yes, they got the sort of remake right, but there were too many good things in the movie to be considered for me to be just disappointed. Because in its entirety, I was not. Compared to the original, the number of characters here going to the woods doubled (though the downside was less character development for some of them), so more people for lunacy. The nights were longer, there were only actually two nights in the woods, and remember the nights were creepy as in the original (the downside here is even daytime in the original adds up to the craziness of the movie), and in this sequel, they opt to lengthen the nights, thus more mobility and advantage for the witch. And as someone here has already said, a huge fraction of the run- time happens in the house (the original's endpoint took place in the house for only five minutes or less). It's claustrophobic, it's edgy. So if you're a hater of the first one, then don't spend time hating here, life is too short to just keep on hating. But if you're an enthusiast of the original, watch this one. It has its share of flaws, but the expansion of the ideas here are more than enough to warrant its worth.
Reviewer 7:
Love it or hate it, The Blair Witch Project is an essential piece of filmmaking and a masterpiece of movie marketing which popularised the found footage sub-genre. Personally, I'm not a fan of Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sanchez's original film. Despite a creepy final ten seconds and an intriguing set-up of the Blair witch legend, the film is basically 80 minutes of people arguing in the woods over a lost map. There's no big payoff, nothing is ever shown and mostly I just find very boring and tedious.
So when Blair Witch was revealed, I wasn't exactly excited like a lot of people were. I love the Adam Wingard and Simon Barrett duo and so I was looking forward to their next project, The Woods which of course turned out to be a secret pseudonym for a sequel to The Blair Witch Project. Early Reviews came out and I suddenly became very excited. People were calling it a game changer for horror films and one even went so far as to say that the film will wreck you, so of course I was sold. I avoided all trailers and decided to pop over and see it on opening day, hoping to watch a genuinely scary found footage horror film. Unfortunately I came out extremely disappointed.
Blair Witch isn't a bad film, but it's certainly no game-changer. In fact, it's nothing much to write home about at all. It is simply an average horror film and in my opinion the worst offering from the directing/writing duo so far. One of the main problems is that it plays out almost exactly like the original Blair Witch Project, albeit a bit more souped up. Instead of having a group of characters going into the woods to investigate about the legend, we have a group of characters going into the woods to find Heather, the main character from the original, who happens to be our protagonist's sister. If there was no mention of Heather then Blair Witch would definitely be classed as a remake, rather than a sequel. Even fans of this film admit that it follows almost every beat of the original: there's the getting lost, finding twig men hanging outside the tent, running away in the dark from something that can't be seen and even the iconic old house finale.
Blair Witch offers no new surprises and the first half of the film is almost as tedious as the original. We're not really made to care for any of the characters and none are properly developed. They're just your average group of young adults being lined up for the slaughterhouse, with the technicians from The Cabin in the Woods at the control panel watching it all play out. When a character dies, we don't really care which is sort of a problem when we're made to stay with them for 90 minutes. There are some nice moments of good humour, but for the most part not a great deal happens in the first half. It's just like watching some friends go on a camping trip. It would've been an ideal opportunity for some character development, but instead we just get the usual arguing and banal banter.
Once we hit around the midway point, spooky stuff starts happening but it's all stuff we've seen before. There are some tense moments when characters go off on their own and hear strange noises deep in the woods, but there's never any payoff. A good scare is like a good joke. There has to be an extended moment of suspense and then an explosive punchline, but Blair Witch seems to always miss the punchline. I was always on edge and waiting for something scary to happen in the woods, but nothing really ever does. I did like the real sense of panic and distress though as we realise that these characters are going to end up lost in these woods for what could be an eternity. But whilst the atmosphere is good, the scares are too uninspired to be effective.
Things do start to pick up in the last twenty minutes though. After what feels like endless screaming and running in the woods, we come across the dreaded old house from the first film. This is when things start to become intense and genuinely horrifying at times. There's a huge sense of dread and unpredictability which had me on the edge of my seat. I thought, "finally! Maybe this is the part that's going to wreck me" but it wasn't. Despite a couple of effective jump scares and moments of intensity, the finale fails to live up to the expectations which it promised. It did a good job of building up tension, but just like the scenes in the woods, it failed to conjure up a truly scary punchline. In fact, the film ends with a very disappointing whimper which left me wanting a lot more.
I don't mind slow-burners but there has to be a payoff worth waiting for. In the end, it's a perfectly serviceable horror film. It uses the found footage aspect well and makes good use of utilising new filming technologies. It's also better and far more entertaining that the original, but that's not really high praise coming from a detractor of it. I suppose that I just fell for the hype and I don't want you to do the same. It has moments which are scarier than most mainstream horror films, but there's nothing that will shake you to your core here. Hardened horror nuts are not going to be impressed. It may be worth a quick look when it gets released on DVD but it's not worth seeing on the big screen. In a year full of great horror films, Blair Witch disappointingly seems to be the first hiccup.
Reviewer 8:
Love it or hate it, there's no denying that 'The Blair Witch Project' was a landmark film for the horror genre in terms of technique and marketing. Made on a micro-budget of US$60,000, it complemented its then-novel found-footage format with clever marketing which positioned the film we would see as 'recovered footage' shot by the three student filmmakers who had gone missing in the Black Hills Forest of Burkittsville, Maryland while making a documentary about a local legend known as the Blair Witch. That it eventually achieved a lifetime box-office gross of US$250 million made copycats inevitable, but no other horror film since then – aside from the first 'Paranormal Activity' – has been able to replicate its formula to the same winning effect.
It would seem folly therefore for any filmmaker to attempt a sequel, let alone reboot, the original; and yet, despite our initial skepticism, we were quickly won over by director Adam Wingard and his regular writing collaborator Simon Barrett's tense, gripping and even nail-biting follow-up that stays true to its predecessor while expanding on the mythology of the Blair Witch. Rather than going for the convenient of assembling yet another bunch of foolhardy adventurers to go back into the forest, Wingard chooses to establish a much emotional (and logical) raison d'être for flirting with danger – an online video of the house which was last seen in 'The Blair Witch Project', and a fleeting glimpse of a figure which James (James Allen McCune) believes to be that of her missing sister Heather Donahue, one of the three student filmmakers who went missing two decades ago.
Joining James on his quest to locate his sister are his filmmaker girlfriend Lisa (Callie Hernandez), his best friend Peter (Brandon Scott) and Peter's girlfriend Ashley (Corbin Reid). Their first stop is the home of 'Darknet 666', aka Lane (Wes Robinson), who had uploaded the video; and having grown up in these part of the woods, Lane shares stories of the Blair Witch legend, including one where a father of seven children in the 1940s kills his whole family after claiming to have heard her voice and another where a mother says a hand reached out from under the river in the woods to pull her daughter in. But Lane only agrees to show James where the video was found on one condition – that they bring him and his girlfriend Talia (Valorie Curry) along for the hike, which James eventually acquiesces to despite Peter's objections.
To reveal any further details would be spoiling the thrill of not knowing what to expect, but let's just say that there is a nice midway twist that divides the group into two camps and leaves each more vulnerable to the hauntings later on. Lest you dismiss the movie as a whole lot of mindless running around, we reassure you that there is a surprisingly well-constructed story amidst the melee, which ties in seamlessly with the original while establishing a clearer order to the hauntings. Indeed, fans of the original will recognize the shallow creek known as Coffin Rock, where something bad happens to one of the characters here. Fans will also recognize the unexplained loud thuds at night, or the cairns and the five-pointed compound symbols, to which Wingard introduces the concept of lost time and the perpetual loss of daylight that adds to the fear and paranoia of the characters trapped within the wilderness.
That suspense is no doubt accentuated by the visual flow of the movie, which is further testament to Wingard's achievement. Yes, Wingard and his cinematographer Robby Baumgartner do knowingly violate sight lines to make us as disoriented as the campers, but the shots are carefully pieced together to alternate between still and moving ones in order not to be nausea-inducing. Technology has also helped a lot in this regard, and whereas such means were not available two decades ago, the use of hands-free recorders and drone cameras allow for different points-of-view other than from the respective characters. So instead of diminishing the viewing experience, the found-footage format rather enhances the atmosphere of anxiety, dread and sheer terror, especially when we are like the characters unable to see what is coming from behind our backs.
The same can be said of the film's shocking third-act twist, which takes place almost entirely within the house that Heather was last seen. Even more foreboding from the inside than it looks from the outside, the two-storey farm building plunges its visitors into a disorienting maze of corridors and decrepit rooms before they are made to confront its real horror. Oh yes, it is here that our characters – and us – come face to face with the Blair Witch herself, a hairy half- human, half-animal beast that stands tall and towering over its victims. These last 20 minutes in the Blair Witch's presence are easily some of the most claustrophobic and nerve-wracking moments we've had in a horror film in quite a while, deliberately paced so that you have no time to catch your breath in between. It is frightening as when things go to sh*t, and by the time the ending that leaves just enough possibility for a follow-up comes around, we guarantee that you'll be left thoroughly shaken.
To be sure, it was never possible for 'Blair Witch' to capture the zeitgeist like its predecessor did, but between convincing fans of the original that this follow-up some 17 years later is worthy of the original and striking a chord with a new generation of viewers, we'd say that Wingard's film accomplishes both excellently. Not only does this sequel (filmed in secret under the title 'The Woods') breathe new life into the Blair Witch horror once again, it proves that found footage remains a formidable technique if employed by the right filmmaker. Both frankly make this one of the must-see horror movies this year.
Reviewer 10:
When the original "Blair Witch Project" hit the screens in '99 I was as scared as I'd ever been in a movie theatre. And while it divided opinion as to being truly frightening or just shaky nonsense, there was little denying its impact on the Horror movie genre - spawning the "found footage" craze that still exists today.
No one movie since has ever really affected audiences in a similar way, bar the original "Paranormal Activity" film and the genre has descended into banality and unoriginality, where studios look to cash in on audiences looking for similar thrills.
I was surprised and the skeptical when I heard about the "Blair Witch" given how the follow up to the original (Book of Shadows) was a pure cash grab by the producers and subsequent nose dive of the quality within the genre. The interesting trailer and buzz surrounding its release was enough to get me in on opening day, however.
This is "Blair Witch Project" for the next generation and more than a sequel it really serves to modernize the original as well as expand on the mythology. You don't have to have seen the original in order for this movie to work, but if you have seen the original then you will also be kept interested by the further exploration of the legend.
Apart from a relatively awkward, fragmented opening act, the film takes a very similar course to the original. Protagonist "James" (the younger brother of "Projects" Heather) comes across found footage online of what he believes to be his missing Sister, whom he has tried to find closure on ever since her disappearance. He and a group of high school documentarians then make plans to contact the person who posted the footage and enter the legendary Burkittsville woodland.
Upon meeting with the slightly off putting couple (Lane & Talia) who found the tape in the woodland, they negotiate to join up with the main group and hike into the woods where they will search for the fabled house in hopes of finding clues as to Heather's disappearance.
The film closely follows the course of its predecessor. With the background of the urban legend and local histories explained the group sets camp for the night and promptly things become eerie. Once inside the forest the atmosphere of the film darkens and the claustrophobic camera work moves you ever closer to the edge of your seat in anticipation of the first sound/sighting of something lurking in the trees.
I found that the ever growing feeling of dread was sometimes needlessly broken by the use of cheap jump scares and thought that the film would work just as well, if not more so without so many of them.
The experience of becoming lost in the forest and unable to return to civilization puts pressure on the group and they are quickly fighting amongst themselves, eventually splitting off into their original groups and going their separate ways.
There are familiar noises and calls coming from the darkness which recall the original, but more than that there's also the inclusion of more detail in the way of audio which points to something much more menacing than the original could achieve (mostly due to budget restraints) For the most part, I found the expanded mythology and more detailed experiences the characters go through on screen refreshing and blended well with those of the '99 edition.
The final scenes come with a nice little twist and the ending is abrupt as it it terrifying.
Not perfect by any means but still a shot in the arm for the genre and a film strong enough to function on its own as a good scary movie!
Reviewer 11:
I know that for some unfathomable reason, there are legions of people out there that found the original Blair Witch as a completely original scary taught movie that would keep you up all night with the heebie-jeebies, or what ever. Fortunately I do not know even one of those people. I've never met even one person that didn't want their money back after having tortuously sat through it (and many who didn't make it through, and not from fear!). It was a very UN-scary, migraine inducing camera "work", amateur mess, about a group of extremely unlikable, self centered, back country inexperienced jerks stumbling around in the trees at night, that jumped whenever a cricket farted. And that ending? What the was that? Even die-hard fans wonder as it showed, nor resolved, nada, zero, nothing! And now, thanks to a lot of undeserved hype, comes this. (Note: Upon hearing there was to be a remake/sequel I found the entire concept of someone flaky enough to financially support the remake/sequel of such crap the scariest thing of all!) If I hadn't received a free pass to a secret preview, and if I'd known what it was,I would not have gone, even for free! But upon arrival, when I found out, I just shrugged, and figured,"Aw . Nothing could be as bad as the first one!" Wrongo dude! Essentially, IT IS THE FIRST ONE! Just as badly "shot", with zero likable characters that can't act anymore than that first batch could, more woods at night (yawn. i'm scared. yawn.), and about as much lack of professionalism nor originality as the limits could possibly be stretched before becoming actually less than amateur! Some advice for those who are going to see this remade glop: *Drink heavily beforehand. Even if you don't drink, make an exception. The numbing may help. *Do a ibuprofen/aspirin/Tylenol combo. It'll help, but not prevent, the headache that the non-camera-work will definitely give you! *Bring a media player to listen to, as your fave tunes would easily beat this non dialogue by miles! *If you're not a druggie, maybe this would be that excellent time for your one and only experiment. It'll be such a bummer you may just never go near dope again by unconscious negative association. If you do like it, get the drugs that the aforementioned experimenter has left over. You seriously need them. Peace.
